Continue Reading››" />
Go to ...
RSS Feed

Wednesday, December 13, 2017

An open letter to the COAS



vk singh

Dear General,

As the head of an organization like the Indian Army, you represent many things to many people.

To the serving officers and soldiers, you are a role model. To them, you stand for excellence of the highest order.  You withstood the vagaries of operations and peacetime soldiering successfully, with elan, to reach the pinnacle of the steep pyramid. In doing so, you outshone a few thousand officers who were commissioned around the same time as you. As their Chief and leader, they hang on to your every word. They do that because of the tremendous respect that your office enjoys. They also do that because your decisions virtually control the destiny of this million strong army. Your actions and words impact them professionally and personally. Since they were always taught to lead by example, they also, by corollary, follow by example. Therefore they look at you to show them the way to achieve their ambitions and follow your path to rise to the top.

To the common citizen of our country, you are the face of Indian Army – an organization they respect to a point of reverence. You interact with the media, are reported upon extensively and appear more frequently on television than any other person serving in the organization.

To the TRP hungry, eyeballs seeking media, you are a soft target. Someone who, given an opportunity, is fair game to take pot shots at. And the opportunity seems to have been handed to them on a platter now.

The ongoing and unending controversy about your date of birth is the biggest story that is appearing in the media over the last few months. Things have come to such a pass that the issue has moved beyond being an oversight years ago affecting you as an individual to a struggle of succession within the higher echelons of the Army. All kinds of theories, speculations and rumours are doing rounds within and outside the organization.

Being someone who has been emotionally connected with the organization since birth, adorned the uniform for 24 years, and now is unaffected but still drawn to it by a sense of belonging, I feel extremely sad. I feel sad because the high office of the Chief of the Army Staff has become open to comment by every stringer with a point of view. I empathize with my former comrades at arms who would be feeling a sense of embarrassment by the spectacle of their Chief being drawn into such a media circus. I can sense their growing cynicism from seeing the open flouting of the values and morals that bind them together, by people at stratospheric level within the organization.

My limited understanding of the issue leads me to believe that this controversy can be laid to rest simply by you unequivocally accepting the ‘official’ date of birth. It is the date of birth that I believe you gave a written undertaking to accept before being considered for promotion. That, possibly, could have been the juncture at which you could have taken a principled stand. With the appointment hanging at stake, you could have asserted your true date of birth. Fighting this battle with stakes as high as that, on a matter of principle, would have truly been commendable. Unfortunately, at this juncture the same battle appears more like an attempt to stay on in office for a few more months than a principled stand.

Today it is not an individual issue at all. It is an issue of the office of the Chief of Army Staff. It is an issue of the image of the Army. It is an issue of the subsequent line of succession. Aren’t you concerned about the example being set to the entire organization? By prolonging the issue through extra procedural moves such as referring it to former Chief Justices, isn’t the Adjutant General’s branch under your command sending a very wrong message to every officer who doesn’t make the promotion board and may feel aggrieved? By polarizing the entire organization into followers of different camps headed by possible beneficiaries of the outcome of this ‘battle’, aren’t you seriously undermining the very fabric of the army? Isn’t a similar thing happening when regional bodies of veterans are canvassing for or against one of the dates of birth being accepted? What if similar regional voices start rising for the other protagonists in this game? What will that do to the nationalistic, secular characteristic of the Army?

Sir, with so much at stake, wouldn’t it be prudent to settle the matter once and for all in a manner that is becoming and in the highest traditions of this wonderful organization?

Yours sincerely,

A former soldier.

Tags: , , ,

55 Responses “An open letter to the COAS”

  1. Sword
    13 Sep 2011 at 11:48 am

    @Yogi – about your earlier comment, before you got all uppity about religion. You call my post “propaganda”. Well, Propaganda is defined as, “a form of communication that is aimed at influencing the attitude of a community toward some cause or position so as to benefit oneself”. So what possible benefit can I get out of raising this issue?
    This is my personal blog which expresses my personal opinion and views. I am not aligned with any organization, clique, individual or party. So on whose behalf would I be carrying out propaganda, and to what end? The blog does not even give any kind of monetary reward, so even that can’t be the motive of my ‘propaganda’.

    As regards ‘accused’ and ‘victim’. If he had ‘proferred’ his Matriculation Certificate within the stipulated period of two years, he would certainly have the covering letter or any other proof of submission, requesting an amendment to his date of birth based on the certificate. Common sense would say that all he has to do is produce that proof and the case is open and shut.
    The whole problem is that he did not do so in time, and now is trying to overcome the disadvantage brought about by this lapse by these antics.
    Incidentally, we were always told that an officer is personally responsible for ensuring that his documents are in order.

  2. Yogi
    13 Sep 2011 at 2:01 pm

    @ Sword – My write was not aimed at you. Both you and me are commenting an issue already in public domain and I was pointing to the fact that whole burden of good conduct and deligent documentation is being placed on one individual, which is wrong and those who accept this proposition are falling pray to propaganda. However now I am on to bigger issue. That is Privacy, ownership and right to free speech.
    1. I fully accept that this is your blog and I am just a visitor.
    2. However your whole purpose behind writing this blog is to bring it in public domain and invitation to people like me to visit is not only implied but also expected by you.
    3. If that be so, than you have a responsibility to be fully cognisant of Public Order and Morality while placing your blog in public domain because these two principles are the very basis of Modern Law and incumbent on every citizen of Democratic country.
    4. By making a distasteful and false comment on Lord Krishana you have indulged in wilful attempt to hurt and incite and are now making it worse by failing to apologise.
    5. If someone cannot even understand basic message of Gita then I have seroius doubts about his ability to comprehend Principle of Honour, Fidality and Moral Courage.
    I take leave of you Sir. May you be with your kind forever!

  3. Sword
    13 Sep 2011 at 2:39 pm

    @Yogi – I agree with points 1 and 2, and partially with 3 above. As regards point 4:-
    – It was you who brought Lord Krishna into the debate, not me. You gave an example, and I was responding with some more.
    – Taste is a matter of individual choice. If you found my remarks distasteful, that is your problem.
    – As regards whether the comments were true or false, I have cited sources on which I have based my assertions. The sources are our own scriptures, so you can’t accuse them of being motivated. If you still feel these are false, maybe you have a hotline to the Lord and know better.
    – If you read my last post carefully, I started off by apologizing to you if I have offended your sensibilities. Beyond that, I don’t think I owe you anything.
    – I would strongly recommend you to get a sense of humour – does stand one in good stead at times.
    – You are right – I can not understand the basic message of Gita, so damm me to hell. I can also not comprehend the principles of Honour, Fidelity and Moral Courage – but I have my definition of them, and what VK is doing is against that definition. You may have a different definition and are welcome to it.
    – Goodbye sir – I am already with my kind. I hope you go to your kind too.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

About Sword